| Volume 1, Issue 2 (April 2007 / Iyar 5767) |
Article
2/9
|
| |
|
| |
|
Antisemitism and Anti-Zionism in the 'New South Africa'
By Milton Shain

Abstract: The
article explores antisemitism and anti-Zionism in the new South
Africa, arguing that Jews have come to terms with a powerful
anti-Zionism which includes some classic anti-Jewish motifs.
In the 'new South Africa' traditional antisemitism is of little
concern, notwithstanding indications that hostile stereotypes
of Jews are held by significant sectors of the wider population.
Particular attention is focused on the Muslim minority that
has increasingly vilified Zionism and Israel. This roots of
this hostility can be traced to wider political currents, both
global and domestic. Given the ANC's opposition to racism,
the climate for opposing antisemitism in South Africa is more
favorable than it has been in the past. But the question of
Zionism remains a concern, as do the connections between anti-Zionism
and age-old antisemitism.

It
is by now a truism that when the temperature rises in the Middle
East--more particularly
between Israel and her enemies--verbal and media attacks
on Jews and Israel increase
proportionately. This was once again evident during the recent
war in Lebanon. A mass anti-Israel
march of 10,000--largely Muslims--took place at the height of
the conflict and regular protests were held outside the Israeli
embassy in Pretoria. In the heat of battle, the largest trade
union federation, the Congress of South African Trade Unions, called
for the severance of diplomatic ties with Jerusalem. One week after
the cessation of hostilities, Parliament held a special debate
on the Middle East which
demonstrated little sympathy for the Jewish state.
These
developments hardly surprised South Africa's 80,000 Jews
who have become inured to a widespread anti-Zionism. Whereas in
the 'old' South Africa--at
least until the early 1980s--the Palestinian question was hardly
raised and Israel was above reproach, media comment and analysis
in South Africa today
is invariably hostile. By coincidence, the mainstream press is
owned by Independent Newspapers' Tony O'Reilly, an Irishman who
has within his stable the well known anti-Zionist, Robert Fisk.
It is very seldom that O'Reilly's group uses an equivalent polemicist
writing from the other side.
Jews have also been
bombarded from within by the 'Not in My Name' campaign, led by
Ronnie Kasrils, a veteran of 'the struggle' and now Minister of
Intelligence. Although on the extreme fringe of Jewish opinion,
the Kasrils' group attracts substantial attention, especially in
the Mail & Guardian, widely read by elites and opinion
formers. 'Not in My Name' emerged in the wake of the Oslo failure and has recently been reincarnated under the banner of 'Concerned
Jews': those disturbed by Israel's alleged disproportionate response to
Hezbollah. The signatories are few and by and large not connected
to formal Jewish life.
With
the hostile anti-Israel bias in the media now de rigueur,
Jews spend much time responding to columnists. They give as much
as they take. The same is true
on the ever popular talk shows that saturate South Africa's airwaves.
Debate includes a widespread anti-American sentiment that was especially
evident in the build
up to the Iraq War, seen by many observers as being fought in the
interests of Israel.
Bush and Blair are today considered rogues. Few South Africans--at
least publicly--have positive things to say about the two leaders.
The majority black population--including Indians and those of
mixed descent, or 'Coloureds' in South African parlance--are particularly
hostile. These sentiments are informed by a broad 'third-worldism'
in which imperial-like actions are condemned and in which support
is given to the underdog. Certainly, most South Africans see the
Palestinians as the equivalent of blacks in the old apartheid South
Africa.
Nonetheless, the African
National Congress (ANC)-led government does recognise Israel's
right to exist. But South African Jews are increasingly concerned
about its lack of even-handedness when discussing the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict. The ANC's long established ties in exile with the Palestine
Liberation Organization (PLO) have generated a great deal of sympathy
for the Palestinians who are seen to have morality on their side.
Columnists and intellectuals invariably frame the conflict through
a South African prism: Israel is
seen to be a colonial settler state offering 'Bantustans' for Palestinians
on the West Bank. The 'apartheid wall' generates
obvious comparisons. It is increasingly argued that if blacks and
whites could reconcile their differences in South Africa, Israelis and Palestinians could
do the same within a constitutional single state. There is little
understanding of Zionism as a movement of national renaissance,
nor for the context within which it arose.
And
yet, for all these difficulties surrounding Zionism and Israel,
most Jews do not consider hostility towards Israel as a form of
antisemitism. To be sure,
they do not consider antisemitism as a problem in South
Africa. In a survey just completed by the
Isaac and Jessie Kaplan Centre for Jewish Studies and Research
at the University of Cape Town, Jews indicated that
antisemitism was a greater problem beyond South
Africa's shores than
within.
There is some justification
for this view: in democratic (or post-1994) South
Africa, classical 'Jew-hatred' is demonstrably
at a low level. Very few incidents are reported and great respect
is accorded to cultural and religious diversity. Government ministers
speak positively about the Jewish community when they do make public
pronouncements. Most importantly, the legacy of apartheid has ensured
a discourse that eschews any form of stereotypical and essentialist
expression. This would run counter to the country's mantra: non-racism,
non-sexism and democracy.
Nevertheless,
the language and iconography of hostility towards Israel must
raise questions as to whether anti-Zionism is--at least in some
quarters--a respectable guise for age-old antisemitism. There
are some indications that this may well be the case. Specifically "Jewish
capitalists" have been identified by the African black population
in some industrial protests in the past and antisemitic placards
have on a few occasions been displayed at strikes around the country.
At
least some black Africans appear to have imbibed well-worn anti-Jewish
stereotypes.
This should not come as a surprise. Over three decades ago, in
a study of matriculation students in Soweto, Melville Edelstein
showed that blacks experienced a greater "social distance" in relation
to Jews than toward English-speakers in general, although less
than towards Afrikaners. They told him that an African who was
loath to part with his money was described as being as "stingy
as a Jew." Edelstein thought that such prejudice arose from New
Testament teaching in school and church. There may well be an added
cause: the historical resentment of blacks against Jewish traders
in town and country.
In
a survey conducted in 1990 among urban South African 'elites'
it was shown that black 'elites' harbored
substantial antipathy towards Jews. Almost one in five said that
the Jewish community "irritated" them because, in descending order
of frequency, they were parasites, snobs, racists, anti-Christ,
and unpatriotic; almost the same proportion approved of right-wing
antisemitic actions and nearly one in three considered the Jewish
community to be "mostly a liability" to South Africa. It needs
to be noted that this was a methodologically questionable survey
and that there are no indications that these sentiments have been
translated into action. But it may well be that some of these sentiments
are driving the anti-Zionist mood.
Be
that as it may, it would be wrong to assume that the Black population
is obsessed
with Jews or that a 'Jewish question' exists. This is not the 1930s
when the white Radical Right placed the 'Jewish question' firmly
on the political agenda. Even the government's policy in the Middle
East cannot be defined as driven by anti-Jewish sentiment. The
ANC is fully entitled to maintain close ties with the PLO. These
ties date back to its years in exile when they had every reason
to look askance at Pretoria's cozy relationship
with Jerusalem.
Jews
have indeed come to terms with the paradox that some of the people
whose struggle
for freedom they supported are hostile to the Zionist cause and
genuinely sympathetic to the Palestinians. Certainly former President
Mandela saw Yasser Arafat and Mouamar Gaddafi as comrades-in-arms
and loyal friends who had helped the ANC with funds, training and
international support. However, applauding notions such as 'Zionism
is Racism'--as happened in South Africa's Parliament when Arafat
visited in 1996--did raise serious questions for most Jews. In
addition to this slogan contradicting United Nations General Assembly
resolution
46/86 of 1991 which revoked the equation of 'Zionism and Racism,'
it ran counter to the ANC's stated position on the Arab-Israeli
conflict--that is, accepting a Jewish state alongside a Palestinian
state.
Of course the ANC
alone does not define popular attitudes to Zionism. A number of
black leaders have visited Israel in
the past, spoken highly of its achievements and have availed themselves
of Israeli expertise. Furthermore, the majority of blacks are Christians,
with a deep attachment to the 'Holy Land.' Should
Israelis and Palestinians resolve their differences, it is possible
that tensions surrounding Zionism could disappear.
Of much greater
concern for South Africa's Jews is the
minority Muslim population which numbers around 750,000 or 1.5
percent of the total population. It is apparent that a significant
element among this community share conspiratorial ideas long associated
with the now moribund far 'white' Right. These ideas are manifested
in the letter columns of the daily press and articulated in radio
talk shows. Much anti-Zionist rhetoric from this sector reveals
classic anti-Jewish motifs. A special hatred seems to go beyond
the bounds of normal political conflict. Jews or Zionists have
become, at least for some, diabolically evil. One sees this invariably
in the rhetoric associated with Al-Quds Day, during the Muslim
holy month of Ramadan, and in protest marches. Often anti-Zionist
rhetoric and propaganda degenerates into blatant antisemitism with
an emphasis on Jewish power, cunning and duplicity.
Holocaust
denial has also crept into Muslim anger. In 1996, Radio 786,
a Muslim
radio station, had to apologize for airing an interview with Dr
Ahmed Huber who spoke of the 'Holocaust swindle'. Two years later
the same radio station interviewed Dr Yaqub Zaki who, besides claiming
that the "million plus" Jews who died in the Second World War
had died of infectious diseases, spent much of his time engaged
with
elaborate Jewish conspiracies, including a bizarre connection between
Jewish financiers, the Boer War, Alfred Milner and Zionism. In
June this year (following an eight year legal wrangle brought by
the Jewish Board of Deputies against the radio station and lengthened
by technical disputes) the Independent Broadcasting Authority found
Radio 786 guilty of contravening its broadcasting codes.
There
can be little doubt that Muslim-Jewish relations have deteriorated
over the past
two to three decades. But one should not treat the Muslim community
as a monolith. Various intellectual discourses operate and compete.
Some are innovative and progressive, with an emphasis on Islamic
humanism and universalism; others such as those espoused by Qibla
and the Islamic Unity Convention are conservative or Islamist,
at odds with religious pluralism and ecumenism. The latter's discourse
is heavily influenced by Khomeinism and some of the more radical
schools of Islamic thought. Common to both the 'progressive' and
Islamist discourses, however, is a hostile critique of Zionism.
But
this hostility needs to be put in perspective. In the first instance,
the Muslim
population is small and there is little chance of South
Africa taking on an Islamist character. Moreover,
the vast majority of Muslims appear happy to share a multi-faith
and multi-cultural South Africa. Only a small minority, albeit
growing, seem intent on dragging the Middle East conflict with
all its problems into local politics. Nonetheless,
these elements are increasingly vocal. More disturbing, they are
finding partners beyond the Muslim community.
Muslim hostility
emerged most vividly at the time of the Lebanon War of 1982. The
Sabra and Shatilla massacres generated great anger among students
(including non-Muslims) at the University of the Witwatersrand
in Johannesburg and at the University
of Cape Town. These sentiments grew out
of a new youth politics, combined with a greater acquaintance with
anti-Zionist polemics. Scholars like Sayyid Qutb, Ali Sha'riati
and Ayatollah Khomeini were increasingly read by the younger generation
of Muslims. Their new found militancy was already evident in the
wake of the United Nations resolution of 1975 that equated Zionism
with racism, and which was hailed as a victory for the Palestine
Liberation Organization and a defeat for the United States and Israel. Further impetus was given by the Iranian
Revolution.
From the late 1980s,
Muslims in the 'Colored' areas began to take part in mass demonstrations
which revealed a greater identification with the Muslim community
worldwide (the ummah). These demonstrations were also indicative
of a powerful anti-Zionism that constantly drew parallels between
the former apartheid state and Israeli oppression of Palestinians.
At an international Muslim conference titled 'Creating a New Civilisation
of Islam', held in Pretoria
in 1996, speakers referred to Jews as a powerful economic force
and to Zionists as responsible for all of society's evils.
In
January 1997, following a bombing in a mosque in Rustenburg,
members of the Muslim community
accused the Mossad of responsibility. A month later, Qibla led
a vociferous march on the Israeli embassy, culminating in the usual
Israeli flag-burning. A similar march took place in Johannesburg,
organized by the Islamic Unity Convention. On the eve of Yom Kippur
that year, Muslims held pro-Hamas demonstrations outside a Pretoria
mosque and placed a full-page advertisement in the Pretoria
News criticizing the newspaper's "biased and one-sided version
of events in the Middle East." An incident in Hebron (in which
a Jewish extremist distributed posters depicting Mohammed as a
pig)
led to heated protests in Pretoria and Cape Town. Shortly
thereafter, a home that housed a Jewish book center in Cape
Town was firebombed, and phone threats were made against a Jewish
home for the elderly and a synagogue. Although Imam Rashied Omar,
the vice president of the World Conference on Religion and Peace,
issued a condemnation, the Muslim Judicial Council (MJC)--the
representative body of South African Muslims--kept silent.
Tensions
between Muslims and Jews have been exacerbated by the stalemate
in the Israeli-Palestinian
peace process. When the mayor of the Cape Metropolitan Council,
the Reverend William Bantom, was invited to attend an international
mayoral conference in Israel in May 1998, Muslim
organizations (supported by the ANC provincial caucus) pressured
him not to attend. Israeli jubilee celebrations in Cape Town that
month were marred by Muslim protestors, led by Qibla, who chanted "One Zionist, one bullet" and "Viva Hizbollah and Hamas." In
an exchange of letters to the Cape Times, Sheikh
Achmat Sedick, the secretary general of the MJC, condemned South
African participation in the jubilee. South
Africa's refusal to issue a visa to Sheikh
Ahmed Yassin, then spiritual leader of Hamas, sparked another round
of protests. In a telephone interview from Kuwait that was broadcast
on a Cape Town Muslim radio station, Yassin denounced all Zionists
as terrorists. Qibla
protested against the government decision outside the gates of
Parliament, and Sheikh Ebrahim Gabriels of the MJC declared that
Muslims "did not recognise the Israeli State which was founded
illegally on Palestinian land."
There can be little
doubt that in a global world, informed by the electronic media
and the internet, Muslims are deeply connected to international
trends and events and especially to the Middle East. All of this was palpable at the now infamous United Nations
conference against racism and xenophobia in Durban in 2001. This hate fest demonstrated the depth of anger against Israel and
the co-ordination of her enemies. Relations between Muslims and
Jews in South Africa have never recovered.
So long as the Israeli-Palestinian question is unresolved there
is little cause for optimism. Only a few months ago posters denying
the Holocaust were displayed at a mass protest in Cape Town against the 'Mohamed' cartoons.
These
developments have not unhinged the Jewish community. On the contrary,
Jews are
paradoxically more confident of their future in South
Africa than they were in the late 1990s. The
same Kaplan Centre survey referred to above indicated that Jews
are less likely to emigrate than seven years earlier. The younger
generation in particular appears more comfortable. It would seem
that the leader of the opposition Tony Leon (a Jew) was correct
when he pointed out a few years ago that Jews are better off under
the new government than under the old. There is, he maintained,
no specifically "Jewish problem"! Certainly compared to the 1930s,
Jews have little reason to be fearful.
Of course, Jews do
share the same concerns as all other middle class whites, arising
from crime, economics, education and health care. But antisemitism
as such is of marginal significance in public life. And given the
ANC's opposition to racism, the climate for opposing antisemitism
in South Africa is more favourable than it has been
in the past. But the question of Zionism remains a concern, as
do the connections between anti-Zionism and age-old antisemitism.
About
the Author
Professor Milton Shain is Director of the Kaplan Centre
for Jewish Studies and Research at the University of Cape Town.

© Covenant
- Global Jewish Magazine 2007
|